Dana Loesch Says “Media Desperately Trying to Pin “Q Anon” To Trump”- Is She Right, Or Full Of Shit? Let’s Examine The Facts

Dana Loesch Says “Media Desperately Trying to Pin “Q Anon” To Trump”- Is She Right, Or Full Of Shit? Let’s Examine The Facts

https://danaloesch.com/media-desperately-trying-to-pin-q-anon-to-trump/

Did the media desperately try to pin QAnon to Donald Trump? Or did he, in fact, endorse them? Is the media being dishonest or are they telling the truth in this particular case? Is Dana Loesch right, or full of shit? Let’s look at the evidence.

For the record, let it be known that Dana Loesch doesn’t know much about the QAnon movement. In fact, she doesn’t know much about anything she talks about.

She doesn’t know that for the entire four years of Trump’s only term, they completely and enthusiastically endorsed him. She knows nothing about the thousands of Q enthusiasts who love Donald Trump so much, many of who have shown up as his rallies dressed in Q clothing, carrying Q signs, shouting Q conspiracies. But none of this means anything, since they have no connection to Trump.

She knows nothing of the dozens of failed predictions involving the enemies of Donald Trump – all of them Democrats, by the way – our greatest American president, and how he would heroically expose and vanquish them all on the day of reckoning known as “The Storm.”

She knows nothing of the hundreds of QAnon connected accounts he retweeted throughout his tenure as president.

She knows nothing of the domestic terrorist attacks by QAnon crazies over the last few years.

She knows none this. But you can bet your ass she knows “that they aren’t the ones in the streets burning down buildings, punching people in the head ( ?? ), burning down houses and blocking first responders from rescuing the trapped children” ( ?? ) – here she links to a fake news article – “or mass-squatting on multiple city blocks ( peaceful protesting is a bad thing in her view, as long as it involves BLM ).”

She also knows that the media “has been fine to give Democrats a pass when the party refuses  to condemn the violence but they’re intent on pinning QAnon on Trump.” ( Here she links to a Breitbart article to prove her point, but the article fails to prove her point that Democrats refuse to condemn Antifa ).

Trump literally says he “doesn’t know much about the movement,” Dana argues, “after quipping that he hears they like him and instead of accurately reporting Trump’s remarks, CNN sensationalizes it with “Trump embraces.”

Trump literally says he doesn’t know much about the movement, she argues, and so we’re supposed to believe it.

The left and their media surrogates realize how damaging Antifa violence has been to their image ( ?? ) and so are trying to create something similar  for which they can attack the GOP… except there isn’t anything similar.

“Ask me again why I question legacy media.”

Alright, let’s Examine Trump’s remarks to determine if CNN was just sensationalizing and deliberately taking his words out of context to “make him look bad.”

During an August 2020 press briefing, Trump was asked about QAnon. He had this to say:

“I don’t know much about the movement, other than I understand they like me very much, which I appreciate. I’ve heard that it’s gaining in popularity. And I’ve heard these are people who love our country and they just don’t like seeing it ( destroyed ).”

When asked if he believed the conspiracy theory that he “is secretly saving the world from this satanic cult of pedophiles and cannibals,” Trump replied: “I haven’t heard that, but is that supposed to be a good thing or a bad thing? If I can help save the world from problems, I’m willing to do it. I’m willing to put myself out there. And we are actually, we’re saving the world from a radical left philosophy that will destroy this country.”

This was taken from the CNN website. For someone who didn’t know much about QAnon, he sure knew enough about them to offer his opinion about how great they were. He very clearly praised them, which sounds like an endorsement to me. He certainly did not denounce or condemn them.

And during the October 15, NBC televised town hall, when Savannah Guthrie asked him if he would denounce QAnon as false, he couldn’t do it. Instead, he denounced and condemned Antifa. Of course he did.

“So, I know nothing about QAnon. I know very little. You told me, yes. What you told me doesn’t necessarily make it fact. I hate to say that. I know nothing about it. I do know they are very much against pedophilia. They fight it very hard. But I know nothing about it. I’ll tell you what I do know, I know about Antifa and the radical left. I just don’t know about QAnon.”

Again, he knew nothing about QAnon, but he knew they are against pedophilia, and they love him and see him as their savior who will save the world. He couldn’t bring himself to denounce them, their rhetoric or their violence. Instead, he side-stepped the issue as he always did when asked do disavow  white supremacy, by denouncing Antifa, and asking why Sleepy Joe refused to denounce and condemn them.

So, did CNN inaccurately report Trump’s remarks to “sensationalize” them as “embracing?” No, they did not. CNN accurately reported everything he said when asked about QAnon. They did not sensationalize or “spin” his remarks to suit their narrative. He praised them after claiming he knew nothing about them, saying they loved him, which he  appreciated, so Dana’s argument that CNN sensationalized  his remarks to claim he endorsed them, is itself inaccurate. One doesn’t have to say “endorse” as a way of approving of someone’s support. QAnon endorses Trump. Trump said he “heard they loved” him, and he said he “appreciated it.” That’s as close to an endorsement as you’re going to get.

But Loesch didn’t agree. She’s an expert on the word endorsement. Trump had to say the word to make it definitive.

After his Town Hall remarks, a QAnon account tweeted its appreciation in return:

Dana would ignore that too, and pretend Trump has no connection to QAnon.

My verdict on this claim: Bullshit. Trump came as close to endorsing QAnon as he possibly could.

Next, let’s examine Dana’s claims that “Antifa violence has been damaging to the left and their media surrogates, and the media has been fine to give Democrats a pass when the party refuses to condemn the violence, but they’re intent on pinning QAnon on Trump.”

Recently a meme posted to Facebook made the claim that “not a single Democrat has condemned violence linked to BLM and Antifa: “Not a single Democrat has condemned or called for an end of the BLM and Antifa caused violence,” the post read. “They are aiding and abetting mass violence across the country.”

According to USA Today, and other publications, Democrats and Joe Biden have condemned violence connected with BLM protests. But conservatives have conveniently ignored these remarks while continuing to claim Democrats and the left of encouraging and being complicit in violence by not condemning it.

When a MAGA supporter goes on a shooting spree influenced by violent rhetoric from right-wing media pundits and conservative politicians like Donald Trump, it’s never their fault, they’re never culpable. Right media and the Republican party and its politicians cannot be held accountable. Neither were they culpable in the Capitol riot. Antifa was really behind it, so it’s really the let’s fault. Don’t you dare blame Donald Trump, the politicians or the media pundits who played along with his false narrative of election fraud!

However, when property damage occurs during a protest as a result of police violence, law enforcement is never held to account by right media, and the Republican party. It’s always the fault of the victim, the left, Democrats and the so-called liberal media.

Now to Dana’s claim that the left and their media surrogates realize how damaging Antifa violence has been to their image and are trying to create something similar with which to attack the GOP.

Here she seems to be suggesting that so-called left media – MSNBC and CNN – both center-right corporate news network’s –   have some kind of love affair with a small rabble of communists, socialists, and anarchists, and thereby supports it wholly and enthusiastically. First of all, MSNBC and CNN are capitalist, corporate owned network’s, as are Fox News. The accusation that they are both hyper-partisan, far left – Communist News Network, as some idiots have labeled it – outlets, is laughable. Most of the journalists, pundits and commentators at these two networks are conservatives and neo-liberal Democrats that have far more in common with Republicans in terms of policy, than so-called socialists like Bernie Sanders and AOC.

Conservatives have been desperate to tie Antifa with the so-called liberal media and the Democratic party – even going so far as to claim they are the military wing of the party – since anti-fascist protesters demonstrated against Milo Yiannapolous at Berkely several years ago. But Antifa, at least the type that Fox News loves to fear-monger about, are nothing more than anti-fascist protesters that show up at right-wing events like Charlottesville, which conservatives have blown up into an evil, anti-American movement of millions of “terrorists” who are rampaging through the streets randomly assaulting thousands of innocent people, and are really fascists themselves. So this claim that Antifa is damaging to the Democratic party because they won’t condemn the violence – which they have – is also bullshit.

No news network is more obsessed with Antifa than Fox News. All one had to do was tune into Fox News during the summer protests to find them obsessively fear-mongering about so-called Antifa terrorists instigating the “riots.” But in reality, Federal authorities have found virtually no evidence that Antifa instigated the BLM protests. But that has never stopped conservatives from making that claim, without evidence.

I would argue that hyping the threat of Antifa has been more damaging to not only the image, but the reputation of right-wing media. Antifa, as insignificant as it is, has no love for Sleepy Joe and the Democratic party. The Democratic party has no love for them. Antifa has never been seen carrying signs favoring the Democrats. They are anti-capitalists. And the Democrats have never praised Antifa, so the obsession of linking “Antifa” with the Democratic party, is disingenuous and laughable.

As for her charge that the “left is trying to create something similar” to Antifa “to attack the GOP, except there isn’t anything similar.”

Is that so? Let’s look at the evidence. In 2018, the ADL released its annual report that found that all of the domestic murders in the U.S. were linked to right-wing extremism. In his article in the Intercept, Mehdi Hasan displays a list of domestic murders connected not only to the former president Donald Trump, but the GOP and right-wing media, which includes Fox News.

All of these incidents, one could argue, were either inspired by the rhetoric of Donald Trump, Republican politicians, and or Right-wing media pundits. For months leading up to the El Paso, Texas shooting, Fox News hosts and Republicans complained of an “invasion” of migrants. It’s no secret that most of the Fox News hosts and the GOP are xenophobic and  have never been shy about reminding their viewers and voting base that immigrants are filthy invading criminals who want to steal their jobs and commit crimes. It’s no surprise that someone took their rhetoric seriously and did something about it. The left has never had any reason to try to create anything similar to Antifa. Trump’s supporters have been worse than anything conservatives could dream up about the left. Among his voting base were white nationalists and hardcore Nazis who unabashedly showed up to many of his rally with their racist flags and symbols, and some of them carried out acts of domestic terrorism in his name. Charlottesville was the start of it.

There has never been anything similar on the left or among the Democrats. No one ever showed up to an Obama speech or rally when he was president, proudly waiving a Communist flag. But that didn’t stop Republicans from calling him a far left radical every chance they could. And none of his supporters were enthusiastic enough to pick up an assault weapon and massacre a mosque full of Muslims, as a result of his rhetoric, which was never violent, or racial.

So, her claim that Democrats and the media have given the party a pass for “refusing to condemn the violence,” and trying to create a boogeyman similar to Antifa… is hogwash. If anyone has been given a free pass, it is right-wing media, including Dana Loesch, in refusing to condemn and call out the violent racial rhetoric of Donald Trump and Republicans.  

And since the incident at the Capitol, does Dana really have any right to complain that the left is more violent than the right? I think not. After four years of simping for Trump, defending every embarrassing thing he said and did, her constant whining about the media being Obama’s personal lapdog, was not only hilarious, but downright embarrassing. But this woman is incapable of feeling embarrassment about her bootlicking for Trump and the GOP.

In conclusion, Dana asks her readers why she questions the “legacy media.” The answer is simple: because the MSM – MSNBC and CNN – that she and others constantly criticize as biased against conservatives, is not another Fox News, is not 100% biased toward conservatives. It doesn’t mirror her view of reality, it has the audacity to fact check conservative lies and misinformation.

So, was the media desperate to pin QAnon to Trump? No. QAnon has signal boosted their support for Trump, even including him in their ridiculous conspiracy theories, and even though Trump has never – that I know of – officially endorsed their support, neither has he ever disavowed them. QAnon was tied or pinned to Trump during his tenure. Its members and followers showed up at his speeches and rallies with their Q flags and symbols. He couldn’t get more “pinned” than that. The media had no need to try and pin them to Trump. By refusing to disavow them, he pinned himself to them.

My verdict. Dana Loesch is full of shit, and it’s a shame she will never realize it.

Is Dana Loesch A Racist White Supremacist Calling For A Civil War? Are We High For Even Considering It? Here Is The Evidence, And It Doesn’t Look Good

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/06/30/no-dana-loesch-isnt-a-racist-white-supremacist-calling-for-civil-war-are-you-people-high-n2348842

 

wp-15913752461398233014178678529571.jpg

 

Months before president Trump’s most enthusiastic supporters marched in Charlottesville to save a beloved symbol of their southern heritage, Dana Loesch and the NRA produced their first video portraying anti-Trump protesters as violent mobs out to destroy democracy and his legitimacy.

“They use their media to assassinate real news. They use their schools to teach children that their president is another Hitler. They use their movie stars and singers and comedy shows and award shows to repeat their narrative over and over again. And then they use their ex president to endorse the resistance.

“All to make them march. Make them protest. Make them scream racism and sexism and xenophobia, and homophobia. To smash windows, burn cars, shut down interstates and airports, bully and terrorize the law abiding – until the only option left is for the police to do their jobs and stop the madness.

“And when that happens , they’ll use it as an excuse for their outrage. The only way we stop this, the only way we save our country and our freedom is to fight this violence of lies with the clenched fist of truth.”

The implication here is that nefarious leftist forces – progressives,  Black Lives Matter, Antifa – are working together  behind the scenes to manipulate and agitate the media, schools, Hollywood celebrities, and the former president, to create fake news to undermine Trump and his presidency, and to incite them to march, protest, and scream false narratives of racism, and bigotry, until the police have no choice but to ride in with the cavalry to save the day.

After Loesch and the NRA received criticism for the video, her defenders quickly came to her defense to assure us silly liberals and progressives that we were all insane to insinuate that she was promoting violence. Townhall’s resident whiny troll, Matt Vespa – trying his hand at comedy and failing miserably – assured us that we all must have been high on drugs or bath salts to believe she was defending white supremacy and calling for a race war.

From Townhall:

“What drugs have you people been snorting? Have bath salts become a problem again?”

Rest assured Matt, the only ones who were amused, were those who read your drivel. No legitimate news outlet would hire you; if they did, they would be a laughing stock, like Townhall.

“So, we’ve gone to Loesch was inviting violence, to she’s a racist for calling out the loony left brigade for trying to destroy buildings and set things on fire. We’re dealing with people who have lost all grips on reality.”

Yes, we are dealing with people who have lost their grip on reality, and unfortunately they are not only people who read your drivel, but listen to Loesch and believe she is speaking truth to power. Seriously delusional people in need of medication. And Vespa is one of those people.

“I know we were heavy on the rioting aspect, but remember the avowed leftist who tried to assassinate Republican Congressmen earlier this month? Shouldn’t that be condemned? Instead, what we got from the Left and their allies in the media was that this might be a self inflicted incident. House Majority Whip, Steve scalise, who blessedly is out of critical condition after being shot in the hip, was on the verge of death when he was rolled into the hospital. But he’s a Republican, so he deserved to die. That’s certainly been insinuated.”

No, it was never insinuated by anyone on the left. It was condemned by both parties. But conservatives have to lie to reassure themselves that they are always victims.

Vespa then linked to two articles in an attempt to prove his allegation that the big bad Left said that Scalise deserved to die because he was a Republican, and a racist one at that. But neither proved anything. They were just articles that carried tweets by Democrats pointing out that Scalise was heroically saved by people of different backgrounds, thereby proving he couldn’t possibly be a raging bigot, despite once proclaiming that he was David Duke without the baggage, and some years later offered a half hearted apology.

“So, in closing, Dana Loesch is not a racist. She’s not calling for civil war. She simply was denouncing leftist violence and said watch out because she’ll be there with an army of her own to fight the Left on the battlefield of ideas. It might be a good time to renew those NRA memberships. I’m considering a lifetime membership.”

The only battle that Loesch and her army of gun nut fans are capable of fighting, is the idea that guns are awesome and must be defended at all cost. 

Alright, so according to Vespa, Loesch isn’t a racist, and isn’t calling for a civil war. Well, it’s already been established that the video was clearly a warning to anyone who doesn’t like Trump. With that out of the way, let’s look at some evidence that points to the contrary to Vespa’s claim that she’s not racist. Here is some evidence I find pretty compelling.

1) Dana’s personal letter to the Ferguson protesters.

In the summer of 2014, eighteen year old Michael Brown was shot and killed by Ferguson police officer, Darren Wilson during an alleged struggle to get his gun. After Brown’s death, he was smeared and vilified as a violent criminal by much of the media, including Loesch, who at the time, was at The Blaze. Loesch, as we’re much of the conservative media, was willing to give Darren Wilson the benefit of the doubt, but not Brown. Does that in itself prove any racism on her part? Not particularly, but what is disturbing was her willingness to jump on the bandwagon with many other conservatives who supposedly have no racial animus against black people, and to vilify him as a criminal thug after he was dead!

After note: During a segment on the Ferguson protests on Fox in 2017, she complained that Obama, Holder, and the DOJ had all conspired to smear the police department as racists. In her mind, the real injustice was that Wilson had to go into hiding and couldn’t get another job as a police officer. 

An Open Letter To Ferguson Protesters:

To those who continue to incite Violence and Racial Tension in Ferguson:

I grew up in a home where I was not taught to hate. Instead, I was taught that people of every color, nation, and Creed were created by God as equals in their humanity and worth. Ever since I became a parent in 2002, I have endeavored to instill those same values in my children. Some days it has been more difficult than others.

For the last few months, nearly every action you have taken in the name of “equality” and “justice” has made my job immeasurably harder. You have defied law enforcement and defiled both public and private property, leaving me to explain to my children that “not all black people riot, throw things at police officers, and loot private businesses when they don’t get their way.

You have screamed that “Black Lives Matter” ( a point with which I absolutely agree, by the way ), while demanding the arrest and conviction – and in some cases, the death of – a white police officer based solely on the testimony of an admitted liar with no supporting physical evidence, leaving me to explain to my children that “not all  black people believe that saying “black lives matter” necessarily invalidates the worth of a white man’s life.

You have encouraged a culture that will demonize my twelve year old son for no reason other than the fact that he was born a white male in America. You have forced me to explain to him that there are some black people who will feel entitled to punish him for things he has never done and for things he will never do – and you have forced me to teach him that, in spite of that, he cannot paint all black people with the brush you have chosen for yourselves.

“You have made him uncomfortably aware that there are those select few who will make him the villain in every social situation because it allows them to perpetuate the cult of victimization. The default position will always be that he is a racist and a sexist until he proves otherwise, and because he is a white male, any proof he offers will be summarily dismissed. 

“You have made my job harder, but thankfully I am up to the task. There are those who are not, however, and your actions will serve only to deepen their feelings of racial prejudice and anger.”

This was taken from her website.

First of all, notice that she’s accusing the protesters of inciting racial tension and violence, as if racial tension hadn’t already been inflamed and stirred up by the killing of Michael Brown. She’s not condemning the people who actually we’re inciting violence and exploiting racial tension. The cop who killed Brown, for instance, the media, particularly the race baiting right wing media, of which she is a part of, and the Ferguson police department. None of it would have happened had Wilson minded his own business ( the authorities sat on their hands for three months ). Instead, he chose to harass Brown over walking in the street and could have handled the situation without killing him. But expecting the police in America to be non violent, is like asking a dog not to crap on a carpet.

She also blamed the unrest on Obama and Holder, as if they had no right to get involved. They had every right to get involved. Obama was the president and Holder the Attorney General.

She’s specifically addressing the black community and Black Lives Matter, accusing them of inciting violence, causing destruction ( some people have, I admit that ) and loot businesses just because they can’t get their way. She’s not bothering to focus on the actual problem, but instead chooses to focus on the small amount of looting and rioting that take place among any protest, which they – conservatives – use as an excuse to delegitimize every black led protest.

She also, unfortunately, and predictably, has nothing to say about police abuse and violence against the peaceful protesters, and the detaining of some the journalists who covered the protests. Two reporters were harassed, one from Huffington Post, the other from Washington Post. Both were ordered out of a McDonalds and detained shortly for not moving fast enough. Some conservatives were highly critical of the reporters. On Twitter, Loesch accused them of doing the opposite of journalism, and in a subsequent tweet accused them of just wanting to get on TV to show off! John Nolte of Breitbart accused the two reporters of being fascists!

These are the free speech warriors who are always whining how the Left are suppressing their free speech. But when it’s law enforcement, who they enthusiastically support, it’s hey, no problem as long as it’s not me! They would howl with indignation had it been a conservative reporter.

She claims to agree with the phrase Black Lives Matter, but has consistently downplayed the meaning and importance of the phrase, referring to BLM as a violent hate group that cares more about dead police officers more than getting justice, and that the phrase is somehow an invalidation of white lives. She also, for some baffling reason, brings her son into it, and paints him as a victim, that he will be unfairly demonized because he is white, and by doing so they will be responsible for his anger and racial prejudice. With conservatives, it always comes back to white people being the real victims of racism, and that black people who want equality and justice and fairness, are the real perpetrators of that oppression.

2) Dana’s sanctimonious letter to Colin Kaepernick: Stop Your Privileged Whining And Leave America If You Don’t Like It Here!

In 2016, an uppity black athlete had the audacity to kneel during the scared national anthem as a silent protest against police brutality, and as a result conservatives lost their minds. To show how not racist they are, conservatives made it all about disrespecting their most sacred symbol, the flag, and promptly told him to vamoose from America if he didn’t like being told what to do. They also told him to stop whining and use his millions to make a difference, totally ignoring that he did just that.

Since 2016, Kaepernick has donated over a million dollars to various causes and his time to various community charities, but conservatives couldn’t care less. All they care about is trashing him to make themselves feel morally superior. Has Loesch donated her time or millions to charity? Not a chance. I guarantee it.

3) Dana Loesch slams Zimmerman Protesters For Their ‘Progressive Utopian Dream’

Sitting in for Glenn Beck – “Obama’s a white culture hating racist” – one night, Dana criticized the hypocrisy of the Trayvon Martin protesters for not getting outraged at Chicago with all the black on black crime going on there on a daily basis. 

“Let’s look at the facts,” Dana says. “Youth are the biggest target in Chicago – black youth. In 2012, Chicago had on hundred more murders than in New York City, 215 more than Los Angeles, and according to the Chicago Reporter and other statistics, from 2008 to 2012, half of Chicago’s nearly 2,500 homicide victims were killed before they could reach their 25th birthdays.

That number alone is staggering, but it doesn’t even begin to capture the extent of the problem. The Bureau for Justice Statistics reports anywhere from 8,000 to 9,000 black Americans are killed every year, and 93% of those murders are committed by other black Americans.

“So where are the riots, the feigned outrage, and protesters decrying those statistics?

“Now, if all of these people out there protesting for Trayvon are so concerned about the death of a youth, then where have they been these past ten years. It’s a farce. It’s a distraction, and if people really cared about black youth, they would be asking what the hell is going on in their communities. They would be asking why black youth are dying at an epidemic? rate. This violence is a symptom of a problem.

“Now these statistics are equally depressing, but you know, Chicago is just the progressive utopian dream, right? This is President Obama’s backyard.

“You have to ask why, with the first black president, are black Americans one of the demographics, along with women, so adversely affected by his policies? Why is government assistance at an all time high? Oh, I see change, but there’s no hope to be found. And why does it take a white girl with American Indian ancestry asking these questions? Why is this not a topic of analysis on BET or One News or with Al Sharpton? That’s the question we should be asking.”

Dana says it’s a farce, a distraction that those who protested the killing of Trayvon Martin are not also protesting black crime, which is the bigger problem, and because they’re not marching on Chicago, looting and rioting… well, that makes them hypocrites.

Why does Dana need to inject race into it? Because it’s a dog whistle to the racists who tuned in to the Blaze to hear how Obama is the real racist because of food stamps and welfare,  and that black crime is the real problem. 

The real farce, the real distraction, is the predictable response from conservatives: What about black on black crime? It’s an argument designed to distract from the real problem of systemic racism, which conservatives have no real interest in discussing or solving. It’s a notion that suggests that the real problem is black crime, that it’s an epidemic of epic proportions, and that progressives, Democrats, Black Lives Matter, and the black community as a whole are hypocritical to ignore it.

If black crime is at epidemic levels, then white on white crime is equally so. 83.05 % of white people are killed by other white people. But conservatives have never been too concerned about that little fact, nor has there ever been any discussion about what a problem it is. You won’t hear Dana bringing it up on her radio show any time soon. She would have to talk about how white people are inherently violent and murder their own at epidemic proportions. If black people brought up white on white on white crime as a talking point and demanded that white conservatives address it, Republicans would scream bloody murder.

And that crack about her having native American ancestry is a hoot and a half. If anyone has American Indian ancestry in the family tree, it certainly isn’t Dana Loesch. 

Those are the facts.

She says black crime is an epidemic and that they should be asking why it happens in those communities. Does Dana understand what the causes are? Probably not. People are not inherently violent because of the pigmentation of their skin – unless they’re white that is.

She then ties it all to Obama and Chicago, because, of course. Chicago is where as a senator, Obama the Marxist-Muslim organized for the communist front group ACORN, and as a racist dog whistle, she alludes to Obama being the food stamp president with black Americans being the vast majority dependents on government aid – which are specifically his policies , mind you – and that this should be a topic of concern for the Al Sharpton’s of the world. 

I guess she forgot to tell her viewers that white people make up a majority on government welfare programs. But facts aren’t that important when it comes to whipping up resentment and dislike for a black president and minorities.

From Adam Weinstein at Gawker:

“There were 1,864 people shot in Chicago last year ( 2013 ). In 2012, the number of gunshot victims was 2,448.

What changed? Better policing, probably. A better economy. And the pushing of violent crime outside of Chicago’s borders, to depressed neighboring towns like Gary – where homicides jumped nearly 30 percent in 2013, and where many of Chicago’s illicit guns come from.

But no conservatives are jumping up and down about Gary, perhaps because it’s in Indiana, a red state where everybody and their kissing cousin can get a permit to carry handguns around. Perhaps because we haven’t been trained to think of Indiana as a tense, buzzing, minority-filled progressive locale.

This, in the end, is what Chicago-shaming is about. Not statistics, and certainly not the rates of mostly-minority victims who undergird those numbers. It is not about hating what Chicago does, or what it actually is, but what it stands for in the minds of smarmy pundits who, if they’ve been there, never set foot outside Wrigley Field or the Loop. It is about Hussein Obama and Rahm and Sharpton and unions. It is a racially charged, bile-induced pearl of fiction wrapped around a solitary, ancient grit of fact.

4) Elizabeth Warren Is A Racist Hypocrite!

Some years ago, Elizabeth Warren claimed to have some native American ancestry, and in the 80’s long before getting into politics, allegedly claimed as much to advance her career. Smart ass conservative pundits have attacked her for this ever since, as if were the worst scandal in American history. Warren apologized for it, but of course, no amount of remorse or apology is acceptable to Republicans.

On NRATV back in 2017, Loesch had this to say about Warren:

I think it’s hysterical that this woman, who is a cultural appropriator, who is a race appropriator, that she has the audacity to engage in some sort of race based attack against someone simply because she doesn’t like their party affiliation and doesn’t wish to see them confirmed to be AG. She’s racist hypocrite. Democrats, and particularly all the anti gun people need to stop making excuses for the original Rachel Dolezal.

“I’ll reiterate it for the folks at Media Matters for whom we pay the bills, so they can get it right. She’s a racist who appropriated an entire ethnicity so she could get a job at Harvard. And I’ll tell you this, the closest that her ancestors ever came to Americans was rounding up my ancestors, so let’s get that straight right now if anyone wants to have a discussion on what is or is not racist.”


Speaking of audacity, I find it hilarious that Republicans will eagerly and willingly jump through hoops to excuse charges of racism in their own party while accusing Democrats of racism. Elizabeth Warren did not oppose the confirmation of Sessions because he was a Republican. She opposed it because his record on race and civil rights are abysmal. But Dana can’t be bother to do any fact checking before opening her mouth. Lying and distorting the truth is what she does best.

Certain Republicans have done and said far worse than Elizabeth Warren has when it comes to matters of race. Jeff Sessions for one. Donald Trump for another, both of whom she has had no problem defending. SpongeTed Squishy Pants is another blatant racist she has shamelessly defended and excused.

Loesch gets her definition of race appropriator wrong as well. A race appropriator is someone who adopts a culture as their own, using slang, dress, and customs. To my knowledge, Warren has done none of these. All she did was claim to have distant Indian ancestry and allegedly claimed the same on a Harvard form, and it became an unforgivable sin in the eyes of race baiting pundits like Dana Loesch. Perhaps Loesch would be better off directing her outrage at her own bogus claims of native American ancestry.

5) Placing white hoods on Thomas & Friends characters.

In 2018, while still at NRATV, on her God awful program Relentless, Loesch placed white hoods on Thomas & Friends characters to mock the idea of diversity. Any sane person would had a sane reaction and moved on. But not Dana Loesch. She has to make everything either about race, or playing the victim. 

I won’t go on with the rest of her nonsense.

However, I will say this: like many conservatives of her ilk, she has made the bogus claim that Black Lives Matter is a violent organization that is stoking racial tension. It’s a claim she has made since it’s inception.

She once claimed on her radio program that she believes black people want to start a race war over the death of Trayvon Martin.

She believes that George Soros is a Nazi collaborator.

She believes that Planned parenthood’s Margret Sanger was a racist who started Planned Parenthood because she wanted to exterminate black babies.

I’m not even going to say it at this point. The evidence speaks for itself. Whether she’s a white supremacist or not, that’s debatable.

Dana Loesch: The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative

Dana Loesch: The Alt-Right Is Not Conservative

http://www.theblaze.com/video/dana-the-alt-right-is-not-conservative

 

America’s biggest, baddest, toughest mother f**king gunslinger!


After the Unite The Right rally in Charlottesville, Va., mainstream conservative pundits scrambled to distance themselves from the fascists that took the life of liberal activist Heather Heyer and injuring others, despite the fact that many of them are fascists. It became a familiar talking point from certain conservatives who wished to pretend that they share nothing in common with their alt right contemporaries. Instead, they made absurd excuses that they share more in common with the Left.

On her Facebook page, Dana Loesch wrote this:

“I want to make something incredibly clear. The alt right is NOT conservative… it is an identity politics movement. It is based in identity politics, just like Black Lives Matter is based in identity politics, just like Antifa is based in identity politics.”


Dana has a knack for making things incredibly clear.


After Charlottesville, Dana tweeted this:

The NRA itself is a political identity group, the most powerful and influential political identity organization in America, that not only represents the most marginalized group, the conservative gun owner – conservatives like Loesch would have you believe – but dictates policy by selling fear to it’s members by convincing them that their second amendment rights are under assault by liberals, leftists, Black Lives Matter activists, the media, and a black president whom they vilified as a gun hating Marxist whose ultimate goal was the complete and utter destruction of the second amendment and the confiscation of every gun loving patriot.

By her own logic, Dana should not be on their side. She should condemn them for their identity politics. But she will never hold the NRA to the same standards she has set for actual marginalized groups that she despises. Conservatives have no problem with identity politics when it benefits them. Identity politics are only a problem when marginalized groups engage in it.

She believes that the alt right is antithetical to conservatism. But like every conservative who believes this, she is being disingenuous. The alt right is every bit as conservative as mainstream conservatives. They share much more in common with one another than mainstream conservatives will admit, and yet they get on social media and put on a show about how much they despise the alt right.

She also believes that the alt right shares the same values and beliefs as Antifa and other political groups such as neo Nazis and the Klu Klux clan that look at identity over principles of freedom.

So, if the alt right is really antithetical to mainstream conservatism, then why do they share so many of the same values and beliefs, such as Christian values, limited government, a strong national defense of the military and law enforcement? Both groups have extreme nationalistic views on non white immigration, an extreme opposition to abortion – but see no problem supporting the death penalty – extreme views on gun rights, climate change denial, opposition to a welfare state, and share an irrational fear and hatred of black civil rights groups such as Black Lives Matter, non white immigrants, Muslims, and Antifa. They also hate liberals, Democrats, progressives, communists, and socialists. The alt right believes that non white immigration into America and Europe, is a Jewish plot, aided and abetted by Democrats, as a means to exterminate the white European race, and in the last few years this conspiracy has gained more and more credibility among the mainstream conservative right, who have spread it in both right wing and social media platforms.

Cultural Marxism is also a belief shared by both alt right and mainstream conservatives. From the New York Times:

“Cultural Marxists” are an unholy alliance of abortionists, feminists, gobalists, homosexuals, intellectuals and socialists who have translated the far Left’s old campaign to take away people’s privileges from “class struggle” into “identity politics” and multiculturalism.

Black Lives Matter is a social movement that believes black people have value and should be treated equally and fairly. They believe that black lives matter, hence the name. They know that systemic racism is real and that black people are disproportionately targeted by the system. Alt right as well as mainstream conservatives have absurdly labeled them as a terrorist and hate group.

Alt right and mainstream conservatives see no value in black lives, and have no interest in treating them equally and fairly. Their only interest has been to malign black activists as thugs, criminals, terrorists, and socialist agitators.

Antifa are comprised of anarchists, communists, and socialists. Like their name signifies, they oppose fascism, and go where they know they can disrupt the activities of fascists. They were a prominent presence in Charlottesville, along with Black Lives Matter activists, and other leftist protesters. Mainstream conservatives are often more critical of Antifa than they are of the alt right white nationalists they claim to despise, and yet they seem to have no problem with certain white nationalists in their ranks, like Michelle Malkin, who hilariously tweeted this after Charlottesville:


Curious, since she has now adopted the identity politics of the white nationalists who so proudly marched in Charlottesville, chanting blood and soil, and Jews will not replace us, and has recently come out in defense of neo Nazi, Nick Fuentes, and published a book after 9/11, In Defense Of Internment: The Case For Racial Profiling In World War 2 And The War On Terror. She has also, for years, been a regular contributor to the anti-Semitic, ad anti immigration website VDARE.

Although Antifa have used violent tactics, like Black Lives Matter they too have been absurdly maligned as a terrorist group by both the alt right and their mainstream contemporaries.

“Can we stop making everything about right and left, left and right?” Dana concluded. “Either you are for individual freedom; either you are for liberty and you believe in the constitution, or you don’t. There are no sides.”

So, the claim that the alt right have more in common with Antifa, neo Nazis and the Klan, because they are all based in identity politics, is mostly bulls**t. Mainstream conservatives are just as guilty of engaging in identity politics as their alt right contemporaries. White identity.

The Left Smears Us Conservatives As Nazis, Even As We Do The Same To Them. It’s So Unfair!

The Left Smears Us Conservatives  As Nazis, Even As We Do The Same To Them. It’s So Unfair!

Shehttps://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2017/08/14/well-i-guess-were-all-nazis-now-n2367437

5313839986_fcbd1a5afc_m (1)120673320..jpg

The Unite The Right rally took place in Charlottesville, Virginia on August 11 and 12, 2017. It was a gathering of racist Alt right groups including neo-Nazis, Klansmen, neo-Confederates, and militia, all of whom were butt hurt over the potential removal of a Confederate statue of Robert E. Lee. The following day, violence broke out between counter protesters and the rally goers. Neo-Nazi, James Fields Jr., a member of Van Guard America, drove a Dodge vehicle through a crowd of antifascist protesters, injuring dozens, and killing one Heather Heyer.

Dana Loesch, Queen of The Butt Hole Brigade, was butt hurt that she and the sacred NRA had been called out as potential domestic threats because of her fascist-style videos by representative Kathleen Rice:

“The NRA’s message no longer has anything to do with protecting second amendment rights. Their leaders and spokespeople are depicting the United States on the brink of a civil war and are actively encouraging violence against political activists.

“That’s extremely troubling to all law-abiding gun owners and NRA members. We’re not afraid to call this behavior from the NRA’s leadership exactly what it is.”

Dana Loesch knows a good opportunity when she sees one. The opportunity to play the innocent victim, to gain sympathy from simpletons who are incapable of comprehending simple facts. And most of her unhinged hordes of gun nut followers fit that description to a T. They’re completely incapable of receiving any criticism without falling apart. At the mildest rebuke they squeal like stuck pigs.

Matt Vespa also seems incapable of comprehending what he reads.

“That’s just insane,” he complains.

Loesch called on Rice to resign over these remarks…”

Here’s the thing. It’s not insane, nor should Rice resign. That would have been insane. Rice did not call law-abiding gun owners domestic threats. She stated very clearly that fascist behavior from the NRA leadership ‘is troubling to all law abiding gun owners and NRA members’. But Dana – like a vampire is allergic to sunlight – seems to be allergic to facts. She would rather play the innocent victim, and her supporters in the media, like Vespa, will gladly stroke her narcissistic ego.

Vespa goes on to say:

“Let’s get one thing straight: the people who rallied in the shadow of Thomas Jefferson’s home are not part of the mainstream conservative movement. They’re not conservatives. They’re not Republicans. That being said, it hasn’t stopped the Left from engaging in intellectually lazy and appallingly stupid hot takes, like saying we’re all Nazis. Then again, it’s their default go to. I guess we’re all Nazis over the next couple of weeks.”

I have no idea if any of the people who marched in Charlottesville were mainstream conservative Republicans or not. But I do know mainstream conservatives have a lot more in common with them whether they like or not, or whether they will admit it or not.

All one has to do is watch Fox News and other mainstream conservative media to know that they have a lot in common. A lot more. Anyone who is familiar with Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, and Jeanine Pirro, are by now familiar with their segments on changing white demographics, how white America is threatened by an invasion of brown people, as a prelude to white genocide. Fox News commentators have been pushing this garbage for years. They would have you believe that any talk of white demographic changes that is threatened by illegal and legal immigration, has nothing to do with white nationalism. They would have you believe that white supremacy is just a hoax, a conspiracy theory, or just isn’t that big of a deal, that the left is making a mountain out of a mole hill.

I wonder where mainstream conservatives, who claim to have nothing in common with the alt-Right, with white supremacists, get such ideas? Could it be through hob-nobbing with white supremacists? It’s now known through Media Matters, that Tucker Carlson’s The Daily Caller featured articles written by well -known white supremacists, including none other than one of the organizers of the Unite The Right rally, one Jason Kessler, who published three articles prior to the march. Maybe this is part of the reason why readers of The Daily Stormer and other white nationalist sites, are such big fans of Tucker Carlson, and other Fox News commentators.

Fox News has also featured well-known white nationalist Michelle Malkin as a regular guest and contributor. Malkin is a regular writer for VDARE, a white nationalist website, which after Charlottesville, allegedly published an article blaming the violence on Antifa. But still, mainstream conservatism has nothing in common with the alt-Righters who marched in Charlottesville, proudly waving Nazi and Confederate flags. No, certainly not.

So, we have the conservatives who claim to have nothing in common with white supremacists and their ideology, whining about disingenuous leftists painting them all as Nazis, even as they have gladly smeared the entire Left of antisemitism through criticism of Israel’s occupation of Palestine, and guilt by association with figures like Louis Farrakhan, and Jeremiah Wright.

Then we have clowns like Arthur Schaper, he of the anti-LGBT hate group, MassResistance, and a sycophantic Trumpite, who wrote an article for Town hall titled: Charlottesville: A Clash Of Left VS Left? in which he made the astonishingly stupid argument that it was really two groups of left-wing socialists that clashed in Charlottesville, and that Jason Kessler was really a left- wing Obama supporter. To prove his argument, which didn’t prove his argument at all, he linked to a Prager U video hosted by the Daily Wire’s Michael Knowles , attempting to make a connection between the alt-Right and the Left.

This just goes to show how low Town hall has set the bar for publishing standards – the bottom of the barrel. And this is supposed to be a respectable conservative publication that features a plethora of writers that defend Republicans, and complain all day long how Democrats and the Left are destroying democracy as we know it.

There were other mainstream conservatives who promoted conspiracy theories that the Left was responsible for organizing Charlottesville and killing Heather Heyer, including Jim Hoft of the Gateway Pundit, Rush Limburger, and several Republican congressmen, such as Paul Gosar, and dopey Louie Gohmert.

Then we had race-baiting Barbie, Tomi Lasagna, who not too long ago referred to Black Lives Matter as the new KKK, who self-righteously chided the clueless Left on social media:

“You should be ashamed of yourselves. That kind of nonsense is uncalled for, especially when we’ve made it crystal clear we do not support, condone, or associate with hate groups or white supremacists! What good do you think you’re doing? It’s this phony identity politics that lost you the election. The average Trump supporter is not a Nazi or white supremacist. The average supporter is a hard working American who believes in limited government, personal responsibility, a strong military, a strong border, American jobs, and America first. The fact that you sit behind your keyboards and continue to demonize and write us all of as deplorables, bigots, racists, and white nationalists might be a funny joke to you. It might make you feel big inside. But it’s bullshit and you know it.”

She’s a classic case in bad arguments and contradictions. ‘Conservatives have made it clear they do not support, condone, or associate with hate groups and white supremacists.’ I’m not so sure about that. I’ve already demonstrated that many of them have indeed associated with WS, and parrot some of their talking points. But to be fair to Tomi, she isn’t very intelligent and seldom knows what she’s talking about, so she can’t be taken too seriously.

Then there are pseudo-intellectuals like Michael Knowles, who starred in a Prager University video arguing that the alt-Right shares way more in common with the big bad Left than mainstream, traditional conservatism because they both engage in extreme identity politics, the Left the inclusion of all, and the alt- Right the exclusion of all but white Europeans.

This is incredibly stupid and disingenuous. According to this line of thinking, those who are the most patriotic, progressives; those who care the most about free speech; those who wish and actually work to improve the lives of the average working class American; those who embrace everyone as Americans, whether they’re black, brown, Asian, white, LGBTQ, or transgender; those who fight against fascism and authoritarianism, are somehow more of a threat to the liberal values of freedom, and liberty.

In other words, those who are the most anti-thetical to fascism, racism and bigotry – liberals, progressives, and Leftists – are the true fascists, racists and bigots, and therefore have far more in common with the Nazis, and Neo -Confederates who marched in Charlottesville, while those – mainstream conservatives – who actually share far more common in goals with the alt-Right – antisemitism, Islamophobia, the ethnic purge of non whites – the fear that subhuman Mexicans and other non-whites are invading America to replace white people, steal jobs, and bring crime and drugs – pushing anti-LGBT, and transgender rhetoric, that they’re abominations. The alt-Right and mainstream conservatives share far more in common than they care to admit. But they would have you believe that there is an alt-Left that is just as extreme, if not more so than the alt-Right.

For decades, mainstream conservative media has portrayed progressives as anti-American, Marxists, communists, Nazis, authoritarians, and every dirty name they can smear them with. Ever since the Unite The Right rally, they’ve ironically complained that the Left has unfairly smeared them all as Nazis, the very same thing they’ve been doing to progressives.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to the presidency of Barack Obama – smearing him as a radical, extremist Marxist, communist, Muslim, who hates America and everything it stands for, when in reality he was a centrist, corporatist Democrat, whose policies we’re neo-liberal – was no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between mainstream conservative Right, and the alt-Right whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The conservative media freak out to the arrest of Henry Louis Gates – after Obama had the audacity to comment on the case, to accuse him of anti-white racism – was virtually no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream conservative Right, and the alt-Right, whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The conservative media freak out over Ebola – that Obama was deliberately allowing it into the US as payback for slavery, a distraction to confiscate guns, to announce marshal law and throw millions into Fema camps, etc., etc – was no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream right and the alt-Right whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to Obama’s comments on Trayvon Martin – to again accuse Obama of race-baiting – was virtually no different than that of the alt -Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream conservative Right, and the alt-Right whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to the unrest in Baltimore and Ferguson – to accuse the former president of inciting riots, and violence against law enforcement – was virtually no different than the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream Right, and the alt-Right, whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to the killings of law enforcement officers in Louisiana, Dallas, and New York – to again blame Obama, and Black Lives Matter – was virtually the same as that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream Right, and the alt-Right whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to Colin Kaepernick’s peaceful protest – to accuse him of disrespect and anti-Americanism – was virtually no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream conservative Right and the Alt Right? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to Black Lives Matter – accusing them of inciting racial hatred toward white people, that they’re the new KKK, that they’re the Left’s equivalence of the alt-Right – was virtually no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream conservative Right, and the alt-Right whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to the Charleston Church shooting by Dylann Roof – that it had nothing to do with the Confederate flag whatsoever – was virtually no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream conservative Right, and the alt-Right they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to mass migration by south Americans – to demonize, incite hatred for, and spread conspiracy theories about – is virtually the same as that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream conservative Right, and the alt-Right whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to Charlottesville – to shift the blame for the violence onto the Left – was virtually no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the mainstream Right, and the alt-Right whom they claim to despise? I don’t see it.

The mainstream conservative media freak out to the El Paso shooting – that it had nothing to do with mainstream conservative racism – was virtually no different than that of the alt-Right. Where is the moral distinction between the two? I don’t see it.

Not all mainstream conservatives are neo-Nazi, white supremacists. That’s obvious. But for those who claim to despise, and claim to be the antithesis of everything they stand for, they sure seem to have no problem playing defense on their behalf – defending the Confederate flag and statues, giving platform to white nationalists, repeating their talking points, and their conspiracy theories – while hyping those who oppose them – Antifa, and Black Lives Matter – as the real danger, the real threat to democracy, is not very convincing.

Ever since the formation of Black Lives Matter, conservatives who claim they’re not racist, have had no problem smearing them as racist. Not long after Charlottesville, Dana Loesch said on her radio show, “Don’t think for one second that Antifa and Black Lives Matter are somehow more virtuous than the alt-Right. It’s all the same stuff.” She also once tweeted that all lives matter. She was harsher in her criticism against the protesters in Ferguson – I wonder why – than the racists in Charlottesville, whom she had no criticism for. She even wrote a letter in response to the Ferguson protesters, but had no such response for the Charlottesville Nazis and white supremacists who actually murdered a young woman. It’s obvious that she views black peaceful protesters as more violent and more of a threat than white racist protesters.

Dana Loesch and her ilk see no value in black lives. If they did, they would support Black Lives Matter instead of spreading propaganda about what they really stand for. They’re more than happy to smear and compare a movement that advocates for civil rights for people of color, to the white identity racists who marched in Charlottesville, because they are racist. They can claim they are not racist, but when they compare Black Lives Matter to the KKK, white supremacist terrorist organization, and accuse them of playing the same type of racial identity politics that they themselves engage in by claiming that white conservative America is under attack by an invasion of migrants that will displace them, and inciting fear and hatred of Black Lives Matter, that they are going to start a race war – they’re fooling no one but their idiot viewers.

They can say they despise the alt-Right. They can claim it’s not conservative. They can claim it’s not Republican. They can cry about how they’re falsely being smeared even as they smear the Left as violent racists. They can claim the Left, Antifa, and Black Lives Matter are the moral equivalent of neo-Nazis, and white supremacists. They can claim that Black Lives Matter, and Antifa are the real terrorists, even as they willingly give legitimacy to white nationalists on their radio and TV shows. They’re not fooling anyone but idiots who they have indoctrinated with their propaganda.

Ironically, since before Charlottesville, Loesch and her ilk in the media have been accusing the Left of being violent – with no evidence to back up the claim. On the other hand, according to the Anti-Defamation League, right-wing violence has been on the rise for years… far, far outweighing that of the Left, and yet the NRA has produced several propaganda videos exaggerating a non-existent threat from a so-called violent Left bent on destroying American democracy because they dare to criticize the NRA, and disagree with how the current administration is running things… tells me everything I need to know about Dana Loesch and her ilk: they are everything they have ever accused the Left of being – un American, fascist authoritarians.

Dana Loesch, We’re Coming For You

Dana Loesch, We’re Coming For You

Recently, Dana Loesch in her bid to remain relevant and influential, appeared in a series of cringy videos with the help of the NRA by promoting herself as a moral crusader for truth.

Who does Dana think she’s fooling? No one but her ignorant followers, who believe she actually stands for truth and honesty. Liberals and progressives responded to her smug, pompous, arrogant, and sanctimonious bulls**t videos, and in turn she played the victim when criticized, like she always does.

Every story she ran on Benghazi on her ridiculous radio show, The Conservative Alternative, while ignoring the Congressional reports, she exposed herself as the conspiratorial clown she is. As a shill for the Right, and the gun lobby, she continues to embarrass herself with the bulls**t claim that the Benghazi attack had nothing to do with that particular video.

Every conspiracy theory that she repeated about Planned Parenthood… she exposed herself as the useful idiot and propagandist that she is…

Every false claim about the AHCA ( Obamacare ) exposed her as the disingenuous hack she is.

Every unhinged attack on Colin Kaepernick, exposed her as a white nationalist.

Every false claim about Chicago and black on black crime… every lie about Black Lives Matter… the time she put white hoods on the heads of Thomas The Tank cartoon characters when she was at NRA TV, exposed her as a racist. If Dana feels comfortable with calling Elizabeth Warren a racist, then I feel comfortable calling her the same. At least, I can back up my claim with actual evidence.

Every false claim she made that Americans don’t support gun control… every unhinged attack on the Never Again movement as shills for the Left and George Soros, she exposed herself as a shill for the NRA, and an anti-Semite.

Every criticism of Ilhan Omar as anti-Semitic for criticizing the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestinians, she exposes herself as an Islamophobe.

Every video she produced for the NRA, exposed her for what she is… a fascist.

Real Americans have had it with her false narratives, her lies, her propaganda and fake news. They’ve had it with her self-righteous attitude that she is in any way objective or fact based.

Dana has subsisted on the welfare of mediocrity, propaganda, and dishonesty for years, and yet she has the f**king audacity to attack CNN, MSNBC, and other so-called liberal outlets for the exact same things she is guilty of.

She is the definition of a demagogue, and a hypocrite.

Dana Loesch Flubs Gun Control Logic: “There Are Too Many Illegals To Deport, But Gun Confiscation Is Possible”

Dana Loesch Flubs Gun Control Logic: “There Are Too Many Illegals To Deport, But Gun Confiscation Is Possible”

https://dailycaller.com/2019/08/06/dana-loesch-gunqqq1-control/

In the wake of the El Paso shooting, Dana Loesch appeared on Tucker Carlson Tonight to complain about not being invited to the CNN Town Hall on gun violence, and how unfortunate and unfair it was that gun control proponents were continuing to push their shameful agenda of wanting to prevent future shootings from occurring.

“I wasn’t invited to participate,” she told Carlson. “I always go everywhere good discussion is happening or where I think I can have some kind of impact in terms of bringing factual arguments, reason-based arguments to the subject, because it’s incredibly important. So, they didn’t ask me.”

She certainly failed to bring factual and reason based arguments to the previous town hall. All she did was deflect blame and lie. As a representative of the most powerful and influential gun lobby, that routinely and legally bribes politicians to oppose any gun control legislation despite the fact that a majority of Americans want stricter gun laws, she took no responsibility for the mass proliferation of guns on American streets. Instead, like the true coward that she is, she blamed the Parkland shooting on the Florida Sheriff’s department, and in particular, Scott Israel.

She’s also a narcissist who loves to play the victim at every opportunity, which she took full advantage of by claiming that the 2018 town hall was totally unfair and one sided against her and the NRA, failing to grasp the fact that people were understandably upset that high school students had just been murdered by a former student who had been trained to shoot by the NRA.

After the town hall, she ran to CPAC, where she made odious statements, and then to Fox News where she lied about how she barely made it out of the building alive.

Perhaps these reasons had something to do with the fact that she was not invited.

Regarding Chris Cuomo – who is allegedly pro gun control – as a neutral moderator of 2019’s town hall:

“I think that’s asking a lot of viewers to sort of suspend their reality and accept him as a neutral individual. I don’t think they can.”

Yeah,” Carlson said. “There’s nothing neutral about him.”

Compared to people like Carlson and Loesch, he’s been a hell of a lot more neutral when interviewing guests on CNN, and like every journalist and commentator on the network, often allowing conservatives to lie through their teeth without challenging them. Right wingers often absurdly claim that CNN is a liberal network , but if that’s the case, why do they always fail to take the liberal or progressive side on an issue? It’s anything but liberal.

Dana, and Tucker Carlson would have no problem with herself, or anyone else who is a pro gun nut, as a moderator. Anything else is biased and unfair.

Carlson then asked her about Joe Biden’s scary remarks about sending jack booted thugs to the homes of law abiding gun owners to demand they surrender their guns.

“Wow. I’m amazed at this argument from individuals who say that you can’t deport people who enter the country illegally because there’s too many of them, but yet at the same time, they say you can go door to door to millions of homes and you can take a perfectly legally owned, legal to own objects from law abiding innocent people. You’re confiscating guns by force. What are you going to use to take people’s guns? Guns!”

I’m not aware of anyone – Democrat or otherwise – claiming it’s impossible to deport illegal aliens because there are just too many, but you can go to millions of homes to illegally seize guns. However, I am aware that what people like Dana Loesch are conveniently ignoring, is the “gun buy back” part of the argument. They ignore it because their intent is to stoke the fear of the gun nut crowd that the Democrats are only interested in illegally confiscating their precious guns, instead of compensating them financially.

And does she honestly believe that government agents want to, or even have the time, to go door to door just to confiscate millions of guns? If she does, then she’s delusional.

They always claim that Democrats, the Left, and liberals, want to repeal the second amendment. Never mind the fact that Democrats, liberals, and leftists also own guns.

It’s never going to happen. But that’s the mind set of these people. They see themselves as victims of a tyranny imposed by a majority of Americans who want stricter gun control laws because they’re sick and tired of seeing children slaughtered in schools with weapons that should be illegal.

Dana Loesch Is A Tacky And Classless Twitter Troll

Dana Loesch Is A Tacky And Classless Twitter Troll

https://flipboard.com/article/https%3A%2F%2Fvideo.foxnews.com%2Fv%2F6113346385001%2F

DL2
Fox News’ favorite hypocrite and twitter troll

When Stanford law professor, Pamela Karlan said at the House Judiciary impeachment hearings last month, “The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility; while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a Barron,” Fox News couldn’t wait to bring on their favorite hypocrite to make a mountain out of a mole hill, and in the process, say something stupid. And as expected, Dana did not disappoint. She made a complete fool of herself.

I thought it was tacky and classless,” she said. “I was told by Democrats that we were going to be dazzled by the academia and intellectualism from their picks to testify at the inquiry, but instead, all we got was a grown woman acting like an twitter troll. I thought it was incredibly unbecoming. I wouldn’t go so far as to classify it as an attack. I can’t stand that classification when it’s assigned to civil disobedience. But she did make fun of his name. There is no way you can spin it otherwise. It’s the last refuge for people who lack the capacity intellectually to make a good argument, or to make a good argument with what they have before them.”

Has Dana ever gone back and read some of her tweets taunting gun control advocates? Most of them actually do qualify as tacky and classless, which would make her “a grown woman acting like a twitter troll.” But leave it to Dana to project her faults onto others. Conservatives are experts in that field. They just don’t care that they’re hypocrites.

Actually you can spin it and you did. Conservatives have spun a harmless example into a personal attack because they lack the capacity to make a coherent, intelligent defense about Trumps guilt, then absurdly claim it’s his critics who lack a coherent argument ( “Saint Donald hasn’t done anything wrong! He’s innocent! The Democrats hate him because he’s the best president we’ve ever had! It’s all about the election!”)

The former Blaze, NRA representative makes a living saying controversial, and outright stupid s**t that often comes out like the uncontrollable outbursts of someone with Tourettes:

The Legacy Media Loves Mass Shootings But The NRA Just Loves Guns

“Many in legacy media love mass shootings!” she said at 2018’s CPAC. “You guys love it! I’m not saying you love the tragedy, but I am saying you love the ratings! Crying white mothers are ratings gold to you guys. And notice I said, crying white mothers, because there are thousands of grieving black mothers in Chicago every weekend and you don’t see town halls for them, do you? Where are the CNN town halls for them?”

Wow. Thousands? Every weekend? What a stupid and repulsive thing to say. And she insists she’s not racist. No, of course not. It’s the Democrats, the liberals, the progressives, the leftists, who dare to point out the conservative obsession with Chicago ( “Well, you know, Obama was a Chicago senator, and he was a community organizer who was inspired by Alinsky to help black people vote, and Alinsky was a Marxist and a communist, and that proved Obama was too, and ACORN did help him steal the 2012 election. There is just no way a black guy could have been elected without some kind of fraud. What? Us racist? Goodness no! Whatever gave you that idea? Obama’s the real racist! He helped black people vote! We can’t have that now, can we? That’s communism or Marxism.” ), and black on black crime, who are the real racists and bigots.

You know who really loves mass shootings? Dana, her hordes of unhinged fans, the NRA, and many of the pro gun pundits in right wing media, also love them. I’m not saying they love the tragedy – although I’m not too sure about some of those unhinged fans of hers, it’s not too far fetched to believe that a good number of these dry humping whores fantasize about shooting liberals and leftists – but they definitely know that these types of events spur gun sales, as well as the propaganda they pushed relentlessly that Obama and Democrats were an imminent threat to their gun rights. Mass shootings are like ratings gold to these guys. And after every mass shooting when sensible people are calling for gun reform, these idiots are looking for every excuse they can to pretend it has absolutely nothing to do with easy access to guns. They’ll blame gun reform advocates, gun free zones, drugs, lack of prayer, too many doors and windows, political correctness, a lack of guns, unhealthy diets, turning schools into prisons, the breakdown of the family, liberals, leftists, Antifa, and last but certainly not in the least the stupidest: video games.

Journalists Who Criticise The New President Are Rat Bastards Who Should Be Curb Stomped

“I’m happy, frankly, to see them curb stomped. I mean, let’s be real about it. These people are just the worst thing that could happen to the American political system right now with the way that they cover so many things. Nobody gets a fair shake on policy, no one gets a fair shake where it concerns immigration. They conflate legal and illegal immigration. They conflate a number of things – particularly on gun control. I have so many things I hate about the mainstream media there is no way we are going to fit it into the allotted time. They are the rat bastards of the earth and a boil on the backside of American politics.”

Time Is Running Out For The Dishonest Mainstream Media

‘We’ve had enough of the lies, the sanctimony, the arrogance, the hatred, the pettiness, the fake news. We are done with your agenda to undermine the voters will, and individual liberty in America. To every lying member of the media, to every Hollywood phoney, the role model athletes who use their free speech to alter and undermine what our flag represents. To the politicians who would rather watch America burn than lose an ounce of personal power, to the late night hosts that think their opinions ate the only ones that matter. To the Joy Reids, the Morning Joes, the Micas. To those who stain honest reporting with partisanship. To those who bring bias and propaganda to CNN, the Washington Post, and the New York Times… your time is running out.”

To be honest, I can’t imagine anything worse than someone like Dana Loesch criticizing mainstream media, as if she has any integrity to claim. She is everything she accuses liberals and the left of being: a smug, sanctimonious, arrogant loud mouth who has contempt for anyone who doesn’t share her views on the second amendment, liberals, leftists, progressives, Muslims, and illegal immigrants.

She is a walking, talking encyclopedia of dishonesty and misinformation. She is the perfect example of how bad conservative political commentary has become. Like your typical mainstream conservative, she never has an argument about popular progressive policies like Medicare for all, the Green New Deal, free college, a living wage. Her answers are to parrot right wing talking points “Venezuela!” “Socialism doesn’t work!” “How will we pay for it?” to call them socialism, Marxism, and to call those who advocate for them, socialists and Marxists. When she complains about conservatives not getting a fair shake when it comes to policy, she’s angry that most Americans support policies that benefit regular people, not corporations and billionaires. When she complains about conservatives not getting a fair shake when it comes to covering immigration, she’s angry that not everyone in the media shares her bigoted views on immigration and that they shouldn’t be critical of those views. When she mentions gun control, she’s angry that a majority of Americans support universal background checks, and don’t bow in blind obedience to the NRA and kiss their ass.

She smeared Black Lives Matter as a racist hate group that wants to kill police officers. She claimed during an NRA TV segment that BLM started out with good intentions, but were highjacked by George Soros and other leftists with nefarious schemes. She didn’t give any proof, but conservatives don’t need proof, just make shit up to smear a group they don’t like. Dana cries and plays the victim whenever anyone criticises the NRA ( an organization that once upon a time did promote gun control, but actually were highjacked by extremists who care more about profit over the safety of people ) an organization that enables racism, and violence because of their false accusations against Black Lives Matter, and their opposition to gun control. And yet she has no problem slandering anyone or group whose politics she doesn’t approve of. Has Dana, or any right winger for that matter, ever taken a few minutes of their time to visit the BLM website to see what their actual policies are all about? Of course not. It would contradict their narrative.

She smeared Elizabeth Warren as a racist for claiming she had some native American DNA. Dana insists she has more native America DNA in her blood, but don’t you dare call her a liar, or a race appropriator.

She smeared Linda Sarsour as an anti-Semite who allegedly supports Sharia Law in the U.S:

“She works with Black Lives Matter and believes in Sharia Law – meaning full Sharia – in other throwing the U.S. government in support of Islam.”

At 2018’s CPAC she accused the media of not caring about about grieving black mothers.

Remember all those town halls the NRA held addressing unarmed black victims shot by trigger nervous cops?

Neither do I.

Remember that time Dana and the NRA came to Philando Castile’s defense?

Neither do I.

Remember all the times Dana and her NRA buddies joined all those Black Lives Matter marches proving just how much they care about black lives?

Neither do I.

Remember when Dana joined the peaceful marches in Baltimore and Ferguson after the deaths of Freddie Gray, and Michael Brown?

Neither do I.

Remember when Dana defended Trayvon Martin?

Neither do I.

Remember when she was almost lynched and crucified by crazed leftist mobs at the Parkland town hall where she barely got out alive?

Neither do I.

In 2018 she put Klan hoods on the faces of Thomas The Tank cartoon characters proving just how much she loves diversity.

There are so many reasons that Dana Loesch is a contemptible human being that I won’t list here. However, when she appears on an obvious fake news channel to lie through her teeth about a Stanford Law professor, is just another example of how contemptible and lacking in integrity, she is.

Dana Loesch: “Democrats Screeching And Raging About Trump’s Lynching Comment Gladly Call Gun Owners Terrorists”

https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/22/dana-loesch-lynching-terrorists/

Dana Loesch is a fierce defender of the second amendment, and her stance on gun control, which she opposes.

As a former spokesperson for the NRA, Loesch is known for berating the mainstream media as dishonest, which is ironic, since she has a long history of engaging in dishonesty herself, usually at the expense of just about anyone who disagrees with her. In other words, when Dana speaks, irony dies a screaming death.

When she isn’t complaining about the dishonest legacy media that is allegedly trying to silence conservatives like herself, she’s complaining about being smeared, as she is often smearing others. Dana, like most conservatives of her ilk, are unable to take criticism, and melt like the little snowflakes they are. Last year, after the CNN town hall, she ran to Fox News to cry about how unfairly she was treated, and that she had nearly been lynched by a mob of violent, gun grabbing leftists. Security cameras showed her calmly walking out of the building.

A dishonest hack, who once recently claimed on Fox News that she is not partisan, released a video last year in which she attacked the mainstream media with this ironic gem:

We’ve had enough of the lies, the sanctimony, the arrogance, the hatred, the pettiness, the fake news. We are done with your agenda to undermine the voters’ will, and individual liberty in America. So, to every lying member of the media… to those who stain honest reporting with partisanship, to those who bring bias and propaganda to CNN, The Washington Post and the New York Times. Your time is running out. The clock starts now.”

Dana Loesch lecturing anyone on dishonesty, sanctimony, and arrogance, is hilarious to say the least. Dana feels comfortable judging others from her lofty perch, berating the media for everything she is guilty of – dishonesty, bias, and fake news, without a hint of irony of her own partisan hackery. She blames the so called liberal media of undermining the will of voters and individual freedom, when in reality it has been the Republican party that has actually undermined the will of the American voters by refusing gun control legislation to be voted on, and purging thousands of eligible voters in many states because they’re afraid they can’t win an election fairly without cheating, and then claim it’s Democrats that engage in questionable tactics. She blames the media for distorting honest reporting with partisanship and propaganda. Has she ever watched herself on NRATV? Her program, Relentless, was nothing but partisan BS and propaganda.

Loesch not only has a problem with any media that doesn’t tow a strictly conservative bias, but she has a problem with diversity, believing it to be a Marxist plot or some such nonsense. Last year on her NRATV program, Relentless, she put white hoods on Thomas The Tank characters to supposedly mock the libs on their identity politics obsession, and then played the victim card when criticized. She also has a problem with Black Lives Matter, falsely labeling them a hate group, and blamed them and Obama for the deaths of police officers in 2016.

These days, one of Loesch’s favorite peeves is whining about how law abiding gun owners are unfairly smeared as terrorists, but it’s nothing more than a favorite talking point that gun nuts in right wing media, like Loesch, repeat whenever the NRA comes under criticism. Which she gladly repeated during a recent segment on Fox News’s favorite show for white nationalists, Tucker Carlson Tonight.

Loesch was among the many conservatives in the media that clutched their collective pearls over former Democratic candidate Beto O’Rourke’s announcement of a gun buy back program if he were elected president. O’Rourke has since dropped out of the race, but Loesch has continued her tour of the right wing echo chamber warning of the dangers and threats to the sacred second amendment posed by violent leftist mobs that will show up at their doors to confiscate their guns, and lynch them in the process.

They also clutched their pearls over the San Francisco board of supervisor’s alleged announcement of all five million NRA members as domestic terror threats, which has had great American Patriots like Dana Loesch clutching their pearls along with their guns.

Carlson started the segment by whining about the Democratic parties alleged gun confiscation rhetoric, and the NRA being unfairly being labeled a terrorist organization.

They’re saying this for a reason, ” he said. “They’re telling you the people who have a 12 gauge at home to defend themselves are terrorists. They are setting it up to do something to those people. No?”

No. None of the Democratic candidates has ever referred to law abiding gun owners as terrorists, and the city of San Francisco’s board of supervisor’s did not call them terrorists. Conservatives who make that claim, are being disingenuous. The board was referring to the executives who run the organization because of their extremist opposition to any gun control and their use of propaganda to increase membership and gun sales.

Loesch then defended Trump’s tweet that he was being unfairly lynched by the Democrats for no other reason because they hate him, and that “these same law makers have been calling innocent, law abiding Americans, referring to them as quote, ‘domestic security threats and terrorists,” when in reality they have not.

If Obama had been the one caught making a quid pro quo with a foreign power, attempting to dig up some dirt on a Republican opponent, conservatives would be losing their s**t. When they claimed that Obama had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, without any evidence, we were all expected to believe it, but now that the shoe is on Trump’s foot, there is absolutely no evidence that he did anything wrong, even though there have been hearings where witnesses have testified that he did.

“Yeah, that ‘lynching’ is just noise,” Carlson said. “But I think you’re absolutely right. So, just to be clear, they are calling Americans who committed no crime, who pose no threat, who merely want to exercise their constitutional right, a terrorist? But what do you do to terrorists?”

Loesch criticized Bernie Sanders for wanting to allow convicted felons to vote, that AOC wants to end Mass incarceration of ( non violent ) criminals, and that the commie socialist Democrats want to implement the Red Flag law as an incentive to take guns away from law abiding citizens while they’re simultaneously smearing them as terrorists.

Conservatives can cry and whine all they want about the radical left coming for their guns, but in the real world it’s never going to happen. The gun lobby – the NRA and other gun rights groups – is too powerful, and because of that influence Republicans have blocked gun reform every step of the way, despite public support for universal background checks at an all-time high, approximately 90% according to Politifact. Even a majority of NRA members ( about 70% ), again according to Politifact, support universal background checks. But Dana Loesch won’t admit that fact. She believes gun control is evil, and unconstitutional, which proves she is anything but patriotic. Last year, after the Thousand Oaks, CA shooting, she tweeted this little gem:

“What happened was horrific. Evil is real. So are CA gun laws:

Universal background checks

May Issue

10 round mag limit

Purchase limitations

10 day waiting period

No reciprocity with other states

Assault weapons ban & registration

Ammo thru FFL

Registration if moved https://t.co/IGG6HxxUrc

Don’t expect hoards of leftist mobs to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens any time soon. It’s the wet dream of every gun nut like Dana Loesch and Tucker Carlson. If it were to happen, it would be in a world without the NRA, and the politicians they own. You can rest assured that Dana and Tucker will bravely fight the crazed hoards of gun grabbing leftists.

Stupid Conservative Memes #84 Dana Loesch Edition

Right – wingers are always whining about liberal intolerance. If you’re a liberal who believes that every human being deserves respect and dignity despite their race, religion, or sexual orientation, and refuse to buy into the right-wing myths and stereotypes about gays, trans genders, immigrants, and Muslims, then you’re the intolerant one. If you dare criticize their hateful and bigoted tirades and rants, then it’s you and all of liberalism that is intolerant and want to silence conservative thought and opinion. Which is nonsense.

Right-wing extremists like Dana Loesch, who accuse liberals of intolerance, engage in it themselves on a daily basis. An example of the intolerance that the right-wing has for opposing ideas, views and opinions, was their media assault on the teenage survivors of the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Right-wing media ( including the NRA ) employed an extensive harassment and smear campaign to discredit and smear them because they had the balls to stand up to the NRA and the politicians they bribe, and say enough is enough, do something. They were accused of being crises actors; paid shills of George Soros, and leftist gun-grabbing Marxists groups; soulless and mushy brained ( that would be people like Loesch, and Squishy Pants Nugent ); they were civil terrorists; were compared to Nazis who wanted to ban guns; and wanted to murder law abiding gun owners. And not to mention, the countless death threats they’ve endured. This is actual intolerance. Conservatives, whose feelings are so fragile they are incapable of hearing an opposing point of view – in this case, teenagers calling for a strengthening of America’s lax gun laws – without completely losing it, and throwing temper tantrums like petulant children who can’t get their way. And they claim it’s really liberals who are the crybabies.

Gun reform activists are all fair game for right-wing criticism. When David Hogg said at the MFOL rally, “I’m going to put this price tag right here as a reminder how much money Marco Rubio took from the NRA for every students lives in Florida,” right-wing gun nuts, and the NRA, lost their minds. David French of the National Review, tweeted : “So, the  adult activists think this kind of rhetoric is acceptable?” He had no such rebuke for fellow conservative Kevin Williamson when he called for the death penalty of women who have abortions. In fact, he wrote an article titled, The Sliming Of Kevin Williamson, praising him , and asking liberals to be tolerant. Conservatives want liberals to be tolerant, but apparently they don’t care to hold themselves to the same standard.

Likewise, he has had no rebuke for Dana Loesch’s violent rhetoric when she attacks the free press, and calls for the curb stomping of perceived liberal reporters and calls them the rat bastards of the earth, her NRA videos depicting liberal protesters as fascists for protesting, or some of her inflammatory CPAC speeches where she has used racially charged language to accuse the media of loving mass shootings. If anyone loves mass shootings, it’s certainly Dana Loesch, Wayne Lapew, and her other fascist cohorts at the NRA. Firearm sales rise after mass shootings, which pleases the manufacturers, which means more gun sales for the NRA, and more money in their pockets.

Conservatives like Loesch expect liberals to just shut up and accept anything they say about liberals and progressives, without criticism, no matter how insane it is. She and other conservatives can accuse liberals and Democrats of supporting infanticide. We must accept that insane accusation, and shut the f**k up, and if we dare criticize her, then we’re being intolerant. She proclaimed it, so it must be true, since she is just one of several harbingers of truth in a ‘dishonest liberal media’. And yet, if liberals or progressives dare accuse her, and the NRA of allowing children to be shot, for bribing politicians to ignore gun violence, and its failure to support universal background checks, then it’s a false attack against not only her and the NRA, but a vicious smear campaign to besmirch their flawless and wonderful reputations, and silence her and her fellow conservatives.

Let’s all cry a river for Dana and the honest media she represents. They’re such victims. 

Stupid Conservative Memes #83 Dana Loesch Edition

 

Speaking of which political party or movement that only cares about the constitution when it suites their purposes, it would be the Republican party and its conservative base, especially the radical, gun nut extremists like Dana Loesch who believe that the second amendment guarantees the American citizen the almighty God given right to own an arsenal of weapons ( it doesn’t ), let alone a single gun.

And how are liberals censoring conservative media outlets? Liberals have no interest in censoring conservatives. Conservative news sources like Fox News, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Wire, and conservatives like Loesch, and some of the biggest names in conservativism like Glenn Beck, Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Steven Crowder – and anyone else claiming they’ve been censored from social media just because they’re conservative – are thriving on social media, like Facebook, and YouTube. The only so-called conservative outlets that I’m aware of that had been banned from certain social media platforms, were lunatics like Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, and Laura Loomer ( some of which have been reinstated ). And what does this have to do with big government liberal schemes? Absolutely nothing. It’s not a first amendment issue. Social media like Facebook and YouTube are private enterprises that have every right to ban content creators who violate policy guide lines involving hate speech. So, conservatives who claim they’ve been targeted solely for their conservative views, are just being disingenuous. Claiming censorship is a tool to work the sympathies of the gullible who buy their propaganda ( which includes all forms of bigotry ) as truth.

On the other hand, those who would not hesitate to censor their critics, are right wingers. For example, conservatives like Dana Loesch with her totally asinine NRA videos attacking liberals who protest the president’s behavior, and her attacks against journalists she deems to be liberal, whom she has called to be curb stomped because they dare criticize a Republican president. She constantly bemoans the legitimate media as lying, dishonest liberal hacks, while totally and conveniently overlooking the media she should be focusing her scorn and criticism on. But since she’s a member of that media, no amount of criticism will be forth coming, therefore exposing herself as a shameless, and hypocritical partisan hack. 

It’s clear that Dana considers herself and her colleagues in right-wing media as troublesome truth-tellers to a supposed liberal media elite. Which is too hilarious to even consider. Loesch is a disingenuous hack who wouldn’t know what actual truth is if it rose up and bit her in the a**.