Category: Dana Loesch

Dana Loesch: “Democrats Screeching And Raging About Trump’s Lynching Comment Gladly Call Gun Owners Terrorists”

https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/22/dana-loesch-lynching-terrorists/

Dana Loesch is a fierce defender of the second amendment, and her stance on gun control, which she opposes.

As a former spokesperson for the NRA, Loesch is known for berating the mainstream media as dishonest, which is ironic, since she has a long history of engaging in dishonesty herself, usually at the expense of just about anyone who disagrees with her. In other words, when Dana speaks, irony dies a screaming death.

When she isn’t complaining about the dishonest legacy media that is allegedly trying to silence conservatives like herself, she’s complaining about being smeared, as she is often smearing others. Dana, like most conservatives of her ilk, are unable to take criticism, and melt like the little snowflakes they are. Last year, after the CNN town hall, she ran to Fox News to cry about how unfairly she was treated, and that she had nearly been lynched by a mob of violent, gun grabbing leftists. Security cameras showed her calmly walking out of the building.

A dishonest hack, who once recently claimed on Fox News that she is not partisan, released a video last year in which she attacked the mainstream media with this ironic gem:

“We’ve had enough of the lies, the sanctimony, the arrogance, the hatred, the pettiness, the fake news. We are done with your agenda to undermine the voters’ will, and individual liberty in America. So, to every lying member of the media… to those who stain honest reporting with partisanship, to those who bring bias and propaganda to CNN, The Washington Post and the New York Times. Your time is running out. The clock starts now.”

Dana Loesch lecturing anyone on dishonesty, sanctimony, and arrogance, is hilarious to say the least. Dana feels comfortable judging others from her lofty perch, berating the media for everything she is guilty of – dishonesty, bias, and fake news, without a hint of irony of her own partisan hackery. She blames the so called liberal media of undermining the will of voters and individual freedom, when in reality it has been the Republican party that has actually undermined the will of the American voters by refusing gun control legislation to be voted on, and purging thousands of eligible voters in many states because they’re afraid they can’t win an election fairly without cheating, and then claim it’s Democrats that engage in questionable tactics. She blames the media for distorting honest reporting with partisanship and propaganda. Has she ever watched herself on NRATV? Her program, Relentless, was nothing but partisan BS and propaganda.

Loesch not only has a problem with any media that doesn’t tow a strictly conservative bias, but she has a problem with diversity, believing it to be a Marxist plot or some such nonsense. Last year on her NRATV program, Relentless, she put white hoods on Thomas The Tank characters to supposedly mock the libs on their identity politics obsession, and then played the victim card when criticized. She also has a problem with Black Lives Matter, falsely labeling them a hate group, and blamed them and Obama for the deaths of police officers in 2016.

These days, one of Loesch’s favorite peeves is whining about how law abiding gun owners are unfairly smeared as terrorists, but it’s nothing more than a favorite talking point that gun nuts in right wing media, like Loesch, repeat whenever the NRA comes under criticism. Which she gladly repeated during a recent segment on Fox News’s favorite show for white nationalists, Tucker Carlson Tonight.

Loesch was among the many conservatives in the media that clutched their collective pearls over former Democratic candidate Beto O’Rourke’s announcement of a gun buy back program if he were elected president. O’Rourke has since dropped out of the race, but Loesch has continued her tour of the right wing echo chamber warning of the dangers and threats to the sacred second amendment posed by violent leftist mobs that will show up at their doors to confiscate their guns, and lynch them in the process.

They also clutched their pearls over the San Francisco board of supervisor’s alleged announcement of all five million NRA members as domestic terror threats, which has had great American Patriots like Dana Loesch clutching their pearls along with their guns.

Carlson started the segment by whining about the Democratic parties alleged gun confiscation rhetoric, and the NRA being unfairly being labeled a terrorist organization.

They’re saying this for a reason, ” he said. “They’re telling you the people who have a 12 gauge at home to defend themselves are terrorists. They are setting it up to do something to those people. No?”

No. None of the Democratic candidates has ever referred to law abiding gun owners as terrorists, and the city of San Francisco’s board of supervisor’s did not call them terrorists. Conservatives who make that claim, are being disingenuous. The board was referring to the executives who run the organization because of their extremist opposition to any gun control and their use of propaganda to increase membership and gun sales.

Loesch then defended Trump’s tweet that he was being unfairly lynched by the Democrats for no other reason because they hate him, and that “these same law makers have been calling innocent, law abiding Americans, referring to them as quote, ‘domestic security threats and terrorists,” when in reality they have not.

If Obama had been the one caught making a quid pro quo with a foreign power, attempting to dig up some dirt on a Republican opponent, conservatives would be losing their s**t. When they claimed that Obama had illegally spied on the Trump campaign, without any evidence, we were all expected to believe it, but now that the shoe is on Trump’s foot, there is absolutely no evidence that he did anything wrong, even though there have been hearings where witnesses have testified that he did.

“Yeah, that ‘lynching’ is just noise,” Carlson said. “But I think you’re absolutely right. So, just to be clear, they are calling Americans who committed no crime, who pose no threat, who merely want to exercise their constitutional right, a terrorist? But what do you do to terrorists?”

Loesch criticized Bernie Sanders for wanting to allow convicted felons to vote, that AOC wants to end Mass incarceration of ( non violent ) criminals, and that the commie socialist Democrats want to implement the Red Flag law as an incentive to take guns away from law abiding citizens while they’re simultaneously smearing them as terrorists.

Conservatives can cry and whine all they want about the radical left coming for their guns, but in the real world it’s never going to happen. The gun lobby – the NRA and other gun rights groups – is too powerful, and because of that influence Republicans have blocked gun reform every step of the way, despite public support for universal background checks at an all-time high, approximately 90% according to Politifact. Even a majority of NRA members ( about 70% ), again according to Politifact, support universal background checks. But Dana Loesch won’t admit that fact. She believes gun control is evil, and unconstitutional, which proves she is anything but patriotic. Last year, after the Thousand Oaks, CA shooting, she tweeted this little gem:

“What happened was horrific. Evil is real. So are CA gun laws:

Universal background checks

May Issue

10 round mag limit

Purchase limitations

10 day waiting period

No reciprocity with other states

Assault weapons ban & registration

Ammo thru FFL

Registration if moved https://t.co/IGG6HxxUrc

Don’t expect hoards of leftist mobs to confiscate guns from law abiding citizens any time soon. It’s the wet dream of every gun nut like Dana Loesch and Tucker Carlson. If it were to happen, it would be in a world without the NRA, and the politicians they own. You can rest assured that Dana and Tucker will bravely fight the crazed hoards of gun grabbing leftists.

Status• Posted on by Weekly Journal
Posted in Dana Loesch, Stupid Conservative memes

Stupid Conservative Memes #84 Dana Loesch Edition

Posted on by Weekly Journal

Right – wingers are always whining about liberal intolerance. If you’re a liberal who believes that every human being deserves respect and dignity despite their race, religion, or sexual orientation, and refuse to buy into the right-wing myths and stereotypes about gays, trans genders, immigrants, and Muslims, then you’re the intolerant one. If you dare criticize their hateful and bigoted tirades and rants, then it’s you and all of liberalism that is intolerant and want to silence conservative thought and opinion. Which is nonsense.

Right-wing extremists like Dana Loesch, who accuse liberals of intolerance, engage in it themselves on a daily basis. An example of the intolerance that the right-wing has for opposing ideas, views and opinions, was their media assault on the teenage survivors of the Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Right-wing media ( including the NRA ) employed an extensive harassment and smear campaign to discredit and smear them because they had the balls to stand up to the NRA and the politicians they bribe, and say enough is enough, do something. They were accused of being crises actors; paid shills of George Soros, and leftist gun-grabbing Marxists groups; soulless and mushy brained ( that would be people like Loesch, and Squishy Pants Nugent ); they were civil terrorists; were compared to Nazis who wanted to ban guns; and wanted to murder law abiding gun owners. And not to mention, the countless death threats they’ve endured. This is actual intolerance. Conservatives, whose feelings are so fragile they are incapable of hearing an opposing point of view – in this case, teenagers calling for a strengthening of America’s lax gun laws – without completely losing it, and throwing temper tantrums like petulant children who can’t get their way. And they claim it’s really liberals who are the crybabies.

Gun reform activists are all fair game for right-wing criticism. When David Hogg said at the MFOL rally, “I’m going to put this price tag right here as a reminder how much money Marco Rubio took from the NRA for every students lives in Florida,” right-wing gun nuts, and the NRA, lost their minds. David French of the National Review, tweeted : “So, the  adult activists think this kind of rhetoric is acceptable?” He had no such rebuke for fellow conservative Kevin Williamson when he called for the death penalty of women who have abortions. In fact, he wrote an article titled, The Sliming Of Kevin Williamson, praising him , and asking liberals to be tolerant. Conservatives want liberals to be tolerant, but apparently they don’t care to hold themselves to the same standard.

Likewise, he has had no rebuke for Dana Loesch’s violent rhetoric when she attacks the free press, and calls for the curb stomping of perceived liberal reporters and calls them the rat bastards of the earth, her NRA videos depicting liberal protesters as fascists for protesting, or some of her inflammatory CPAC speeches where she has used racially charged language to accuse the media of loving mass shootings. If anyone loves mass shootings, it’s certainly Dana Loesch, Wayne Lapew, and her other fascist cohorts at the NRA. Firearm sales rise after mass shootings, which pleases the manufacturers, which means more gun sales for the NRA, and more money in their pockets.

Conservatives like Loesch expect liberals to just shut up and accept anything they say about liberals and progressives, without criticism, no matter how insane it is. She and other conservatives can accuse liberals and Democrats of supporting infanticide. We must accept that insane accusation, and shut the f**k up, and if we dare criticize her, then we’re being intolerant. She proclaimed it, so it must be true, since she is just one of several harbingers of truth in a ‘dishonest liberal media’. And yet, if liberals or progressives dare accuse her, and the NRA of allowing children to be shot, for bribing politicians to ignore gun violence, and its failure to support universal background checks, then it’s a false attack against not only her and the NRA, but a vicious smear campaign to besmirch their flawless and wonderful reputations, and silence her and her fellow conservatives.

Let’s all cry a river for Dana and the honest media she represents. They’re such victims. 

  • Actually, liberals and progressives want everyone to think for themselves. Dana and her fellow gun extremists at the NRA would rather have everyone not only thinking alike, but marching in lock step with the NRA’s fascist vision of America, where everyone is armed to the teeth, watches NRA TV, believes they are the harbingers of truth and freedom, and anyone who criticizes them is un American.

Posted in Dana Loesch, Stupid Conservative memes

Stupid Conservative Memes #83 Dana Loesch Edition

Posted on by Weekly Journal

 

Speaking of which political party or movement that only cares about the constitution when it suites their purposes, it would be the Republican party and its conservative base, especially the radical, gun nut extremists like Dana Loesch who believe that the second amendment guarantees the American citizen the almighty God given right to own an arsenal of weapons ( it doesn’t ), let alone a single gun.

And how are liberals censoring conservative media outlets? Liberals have no interest in censoring conservatives. Conservative news sources like Fox News, Breitbart, The Blaze, The Daily Wire, and conservatives like Loesch, and some of the biggest names in conservativism like Glenn Beck, Ben Shapiro, Dennis Prager, Steven Crowder – and anyone else claiming they’ve been censored from social media just because they’re conservative – are thriving on social media, like Facebook, and YouTube. The only so-called conservative outlets that I’m aware of that had been banned from certain social media platforms, were lunatics like Alex Jones, Milo Yiannopoulos, and Laura Loomer ( some of which have been reinstated ). And what does this have to do with big government liberal schemes? Absolutely nothing. It’s not a first amendment issue. Social media like Facebook and YouTube are private enterprises that have every right to ban content creators who violate policy guide lines involving hate speech. So, conservatives who claim they’ve been targeted solely for their conservative views, are just being disingenuous. Claiming censorship is a tool to work the sympathies of the gullible who buy their propaganda ( which includes all forms of bigotry ) as truth.

On the other hand, those who would not hesitate to censor their critics, are right wingers. For example, conservatives like Dana Loesch with her totally asinine NRA videos attacking liberals who protest the president’s behavior, and her attacks against journalists she deems to be liberal, whom she has called to be curb stomped because they dare criticize a Republican president. She constantly bemoans the legitimate media as lying, dishonest liberal hacks, while totally and conveniently overlooking the media she should be focusing her scorn and criticism on. But since she’s a member of that media, no amount of criticism will be forth coming, therefore exposing herself as a shameless, and hypocritical partisan hack. 

It’s clear that Dana considers herself and her colleagues in right-wing media as troublesome truth-tellers to a supposed liberal media elite. Which is too hilarious to even consider. Loesch is a disingenuous hack who wouldn’t know what actual truth is if it rose up and bit her in the a**.