Dana Loesch Is A Tacky And Classless Twitter Troll


Fox News’ favorite hypocrite and twitter troll

When Stanford law professor, Pamela Karlan said at the House Judiciary impeachment hearings last month, “The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility; while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a Barron,” Fox News couldn’t wait to bring on their favorite hypocrite to make a mountain out of a mole hill, and in the process, say something stupid. And as expected, Dana did not disappoint. She made a complete fool of herself.

I thought it was tacky and classless,” she said. “I was told by Democrats that we were going to be dazzled by the academia and intellectualism from their picks to testify at the inquiry, but instead, all we got was a grown woman acting like an twitter troll. I thought it was incredibly unbecoming. I wouldn’t go so far as to classify it as an attack. I can’t stand that classification when it’s assigned to civil disobedience. But she did make fun of his name. There is no way you can spin it otherwise. It’s the last refuge for people who lack the capacity intellectually to make a good argument, or to make a good argument with what they have before them.”

Has Dana ever gone back and read some of her tweets taunting gun control advocates? Most of them actually do qualify as tacky and classless, which would make her “a grown woman acting like a twitter troll.” But leave it to Dana to project her faults onto others. Conservatives are experts in that field. They just don’t care that they’re hypocrites.

Actually you can spin it and you did. Conservatives have spun a harmless example into a personal attack because they lack the capacity to make a coherent, intelligent defense about Trumps guilt, then absurdly claim it’s his critics who lack a coherent argument ( “Saint Donald hasn’t done anything wrong! He’s innocent! The Democrats hate him because he’s the best president we’ve ever had! It’s all about the election!”)

The former Blaze, NRA representative makes a living saying controversial, and outright stupid s**t that often comes out like the uncontrollable outbursts of someone with Tourettes:

The Legacy Media Loves Mass Shootings But The NRA Just Loves Guns

“Many in legacy media love mass shootings!” she said at 2018’s CPAC. “You guys love it! I’m not saying you love the tragedy, but I am saying you love the ratings! Crying white mothers are ratings gold to you guys. And notice I said, crying white mothers, because there are thousands of grieving black mothers in Chicago every weekend and you don’t see town halls for them, do you? Where are the CNN town halls for them?”

Wow. Thousands? Every weekend? What a stupid and repulsive thing to say. And she insists she’s not racist. No, of course not. It’s the Democrats, the liberals, the progressives, the leftists, who dare to point out the conservative obsession with Chicago ( “Well, you know, Obama was a Chicago senator, and he was a community organizer who was inspired by Alinsky to help black people vote, and Alinsky was a Marxist and a communist, and that proved Obama was too, and ACORN did help him steal the 2012 election. There is just no way a black guy could have been elected without some kind of fraud. What? Us racist? Goodness no! Whatever gave you that idea? Obama’s the real racist! He helped black people vote! We can’t have that now, can we? That’s communism or Marxism.” ), and black on black crime, who are the real racists and bigots.

You know who really loves mass shootings? Dana, her hordes of unhinged fans, the NRA, and many of the pro gun pundits in right wing media, also love them. I’m not saying they love the tragedy – although I’m not too sure about some of those unhinged fans of hers, it’s not too far fetched to believe that a good number of these dry humping whores fantasize about shooting liberals and leftists – but they definitely know that these types of events spur gun sales, as well as the propaganda they pushed relentlessly that Obama and Democrats were an imminent threat to their gun rights. Mass shootings are like ratings gold to these guys. And after every mass shooting when sensible people are calling for gun reform, these idiots are looking for every excuse they can to pretend it has absolutely nothing to do with easy access to guns. They’ll blame gun reform advocates, gun free zones, drugs, lack of prayer, too many doors and windows, political correctness, a lack of guns, unhealthy diets, turning schools into prisons, the breakdown of the family, liberals, leftists, Antifa, and last but certainly not in the least the stupidest: video games.

Journalists Who Criticise The New President Are Rat Bastards Who Should Be Curb Stomped

“I’m happy, frankly, to see them curb stomped. I mean, let’s be real about it. These people are just the worst thing that could happen to the American political system right now with the way that they cover so many things. Nobody gets a fair shake on policy, no one gets a fair shake where it concerns immigration. They conflate legal and illegal immigration. They conflate a number of things – particularly on gun control. I have so many things I hate about the mainstream media there is no way we are going to fit it into the allotted time. They are the rat bastards of the earth and a boil on the backside of American politics.”

Time Is Running Out For The Dishonest Mainstream Media

‘We’ve had enough of the lies, the sanctimony, the arrogance, the hatred, the pettiness, the fake news. We are done with your agenda to undermine the voters will, and individual liberty in America. To every lying member of the media, to every Hollywood phoney, the role model athletes who use their free speech to alter and undermine what our flag represents. To the politicians who would rather watch America burn than lose an ounce of personal power, to the late night hosts that think their opinions ate the only ones that matter. To the Joy Reids, the Morning Joes, the Micas. To those who stain honest reporting with partisanship. To those who bring bias and propaganda to CNN, the Washington Post, and the New York Times… your time is running out.”

To be honest, I can’t imagine anything worse than someone like Dana Loesch criticizing mainstream media, as if she has any integrity to claim. She is everything she accuses liberals and the left of being: a smug, sanctimonious, arrogant loud mouth who has contempt for anyone who doesn’t share her views on the second amendment, liberals, leftists, progressives, Muslims, and illegal immigrants.

She is a walking, talking encyclopedia of dishonesty and misinformation. She is the perfect example of how bad conservative political commentary has become. Like your typical mainstream conservative, she never has an argument about popular progressive policies like Medicare for all, the Green New Deal, free college, a living wage. Her answers are to parrot right wing talking points “Venezuela!” “Socialism doesn’t work!” “How will we pay for it?” to call them socialism, Marxism, and to call those who advocate for them, socialists and Marxists. When she complains about conservatives not getting a fair shake when it comes to policy, she’s angry that most Americans support policies that benefit regular people, not corporations and billionaires. When she complains about conservatives not getting a fair shake when it comes to covering immigration, she’s angry that not everyone in the media shares her bigoted views on immigration and that they shouldn’t be critical of those views. When she mentions gun control, she’s angry that a majority of Americans support universal background checks, and don’t bow in blind obedience to the NRA and kiss their ass.

She smeared Black Lives Matter as a racist hate group that wants to kill police officers. She claimed during an NRA TV segment that BLM started out with good intentions, but were highjacked by George Soros and other leftists with nefarious schemes. She didn’t give any proof, but conservatives don’t need proof, just make shit up to smear a group they don’t like. Dana cries and plays the victim whenever anyone criticises the NRA ( an organization that once upon a time did promote gun control, but actually were highjacked by extremists who care more about profit over the safety of people ) an organization that enables racism, and violence because of their false accusations against Black Lives Matter, and their opposition to gun control. And yet she has no problem slandering anyone or group whose politics she doesn’t approve of. Has Dana, or any right winger for that matter, ever taken a few minutes of their time to visit the BLM website to see what their actual policies are all about? Of course not. It would contradict their narrative.

She smeared Elizabeth Warren as a racist for claiming she had some native American DNA. Dana insists she has more native America DNA in her blood, but don’t you dare call her a liar, or a race appropriator.

She smeared Linda Sarsour as an anti-Semite who allegedly supports Sharia Law in the U.S:

“She works with Black Lives Matter and believes in Sharia Law – meaning full Sharia – in other throwing the U.S. government in support of Islam.”

At 2018’s CPAC she accused the media of not caring about about grieving black mothers.

Remember all those town halls the NRA held addressing unarmed black victims shot by trigger nervous cops?

Neither do I.

Remember that time Dana and the NRA came to Philando Castile’s defense?

Neither do I.

Remember all the times Dana and her NRA buddies joined all those Black Lives Matter marches proving just how much they care about black lives?

Neither do I.

Remember when Dana joined the peaceful marches in Baltimore and Ferguson after the deaths of Freddie Gray, and Michael Brown?

Neither do I.

Remember when Dana defended Trayvon Martin?

Neither do I.

Remember when she was almost lynched and crucified by crazed leftist mobs at the Parkland town hall where she barely got out alive?

Neither do I.

In 2018 she put Klan hoods on the faces of Thomas The Tank cartoon characters proving just how much she loves diversity.

There are so many reasons that Dana Loesch is a contemptible human being that I won’t list here. However, when she appears on an obvious fake news channel to lie through her teeth about a Stanford Law professor, is just another example of how contemptible and lacking in integrity, she is.

%d bloggers like this: